Wikipedia reliable source.

Get reliable guidance, insight, and easy-to-understand explanations, written, edited, and verified to Britannica’s exacting standards. Advocacy for Animals Presenting Advocacy for Animals , a blog focused primarily on animal rights, wildlife conservation, environmental health and safety, and the legal and cultural issues related to these topics.using books and articles and other appropriate sources. What you find in your other sources will be more detailed, more precise, and more carefully reasoned than the summary you found in an encyclopedia. The sources you cite in your paper will be the more detailed sources you have used. All you need to do with Wikipedia, then, is thank it in ...External criticism is a process by which historians determine whether a source is authentic by checking the validity of the source. Internal criticism looks at the reliability of an authenticated source after it has been subjected to extern...Get reliable guidance, insight, and easy-to-understand explanations, written, edited, and verified to Britannica’s exacting standards. Advocacy for Animals Presenting Advocacy for Animals , a blog focused primarily on animal rights, wildlife conservation, environmental health and safety, and the legal and cultural issues related to these topics.

The historicity of the Bible is the question of the Bible's relationship to history—covering not just the Bible's acceptability as history but also the ability to understand the literary forms of biblical narrative. One can extend biblical historicity to the evaluation of whether or not the Christian New Testament is an accurate record of the historical Jesus and of the …There’s some disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source. Because it can be edited by anyone, many people argue that it’s easy for misleading information to be added to an article without the reader knowing. Others argue that because Wikipedia articles cite their sources, and because they are worked on by so ... Overview. Wikipedia has articles about every topic you can imagine — from Taylor Swift to “toast sandwiches,” among the online encyclopedia’s 6.6 million articles. But that trove of ...

At least three independent editors have reviewed the sources listed above and found them to not be reliable.Additionally, many editors have reviewed the sources in the article, especially the Casper Star Tribune article and found them to be reliable.Wikipedia is a private website, you have no right to free speech.If you legitimately believe that you are …The linked video is a reliable source and I ask to create an entry in the article, that "people are beaten in Ukraine for wearing Saint Georgian Cross as symbol of victory in Great Patriotic War". The evidence is provided. 87.78.236.178 15:35, 10 …

For sources pertaining primarily or specifically to Christian music of all genres, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources . For sources that deal with South Korean culture, including K-pop and other forms of Korean music, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Reliable sources . For sources that focus on Latin music and its subgenres, see ...The claim “I consulted the most reliable source known to modern politicians – Wikipedia.” Steve Webb MP, pensions minister, House of Commons, 2008A secondary source summarizes one or more primary or secondary sources. In general, Wikipedia articles should rely on reliable secondary sources. A tertiary source is usually a document that summarizes primary, secondary and other tertiary sources. Encyclopedias, including Wikipedia, are tertiary sources.Jan 9, 2021 · Since 2018 Facebook has used Wikipedia to provide information buttons with the sources of news articles. ... embarrassments—and its own disclaimer that “Wikipedia is not a reliable source ...

Recognizing this challenge, researchers have developed an AI program called SIDE (Source-Inference from Derivability Evaluation) that aims to improve the reliability of Wikipedia references. SIDE achieves this by training algorithms to identify citations on the website that may be questionable. The AI program operates under the assumption that ...

Are you a beginner looking to dive into the world of JavaScript programming? Well, you’re in luck. In this article, we will explore the best sources to find reliable and free JavaScript downloads.

This section is primarily about Bankrate, not The Points Guy and the Reuters source does not mention The Points Guy. The source mentioning the company’s offices is not reliable - it appears to be a personal or PR blog. Partly done: Removed the sentence starting with 'London office' and its source. For the rest, I assume you mean request #3 ...Beware of sources on the internet that look like trade/professional articles, but don't have reliable content. Magazine articles, books and newspaper articles from well-established newspapers - written for a general audience by authors or journalists who have consulted reliable sources and vetted through an editor. These sources may provide ...For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an ...“Wikipedia, because of its open-source nature, allows for information to be updated really, really quickly.” More on Science and Tech Canadians want urgent climate action, but most not willing ...Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileI don't think that anyone would dispute that Lethal Politics qualifies as a reliable source for Wikipedia. The blog from 2006 is a different matter. The estimates in both are identical as far as I can tell, so I think it would be pertinent that if Rummel has to be cited, we stick with the book, and not the blog which takes readers to a polemical, right-wing site.Reliable Sources is an American Sunday morning talk show that aired on CNN from 1992 to 2022. It focused on analysis of and commentary on the American news media. It aired from 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM ET, from CNN's WarnerMedia studios in New York City.

Sports enthusiasts around the world are always on the lookout for ways to catch their favorite teams in action, especially when it comes to live matches. One of the most reliable sources for live match streaming is through official sports w...The Free Dictionary is an American online dictionary and encyclopedia that aggregates information from various sources. It is accessible in fourteen languages. History. The Free Dictionary was launched in 2005 by Farlex. In the ... is done to avoid duplicate content in the search-engine results and prevent user traffic that would otherwise go to Wikipedia. …For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an ...TheCollector is a community for scholars, classrooms, and enthusiasts. We broaden our audience's understanding of the humanities through articles and discoveries from ancient history to the modern era. Our interests include ancient through modern philosophy, renaissance paintings to modern sculptures, conquerors, conceptual art, and more. We ...If a citation without an external link is challenged as unavailable, any of the following is sufficient to show the material to be reasonably available (though not necessarily reliable): providing an ISBN or OCLC number; linking to an established Wikipedia article about the source (the work, its author, or its publisher); or directly quoting ...Definition. Fake news sites deliberately publish hoaxes and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. These sites are distinguished from news satire (which is usually intended to be humorous) as they mislead and sometimes profit from readers' gullibility. While most fake news sites are portrayed to be spinoffs of other news sites, …This section is primarily about Bankrate, not The Points Guy and the Reuters source does not mention The Points Guy. The source mentioning the company’s offices is not reliable - it appears to be a personal or PR blog. Partly done: Removed the sentence starting with 'London office' and its source. For the rest, I assume you mean request #3 ...

With that said, this is our 2020 list of go to fact checkers. Politifact– is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others who speak up in American politics. PolitiFact is owned by the Poynter Institute, which also operates the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN) that sets standards for fact ...

TimidGuy ( talk) 16:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC) TG: 1 - there are no scholarly, peer reviewed research papers that say that that members of cults have a low, high or "normal" "field independence/depend ce" score. This is a psychometric test used, mainly, in …SourceForge is a web service that offers software consumers a centralized online location to control and manage open-source software projects and research business software. It provides source code repository hosting, bug tracking, mirroring of downloads for load balancing, a wiki for documentation, developer and user mailing lists, user-support …If you’re looking for a reliable source of clean drinking water, Primo Water may be just what you need. With over 44,000 retail locations across the United States, finding a Primo Water location near you should be easy.According to research conducted over the years — including a scientific study published by the journal Nature in 2005 and a report commissioned by the site's Wikimedia Foundation in 2012 —...Wikipedia's information is reliable not because it uses a single "authoritative" source as a reference, but rather because it is a collection of references that represents the accepted knowledge of the academic world.Published: in a source with a reputation for editorial quality, and peer-reviewed if possible.; Reliable: it's a source you'd point a patron to if they wanted to know more.; Supports the text: the source should back up what is stated.If it doesn't, but is a good general resource for the topic (such as a specialty encyclopedia), consider adding the source to a "further …The information at Wikipedia:Reliable source examples provides a more specific answer to people questioning this idea. The book is newly published. It is not a standard or well known book nor authoritative. It is expensive. With the scant info given now, it can be googled up at book selling sites.The Forbes business model consists of a paid contributor network making money per article based on traffic benchmarks. Here are the details of how the model works by Forbes magazine editor Randall Lane, “Why Forbes Is Investing Big Money In Its Contributor Network.”. Forbes also generates revenue through subscriptions and …WW wiki is not a reliable source - Wikipedia Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any ...With that said, this is our 2020 list of go to fact checkers. Politifact– is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others who speak up in American politics. PolitiFact is owned by the Poynter Institute, which also operates the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN) that sets standards for fact ...

I don't think that anyone would dispute that Lethal Politics qualifies as a reliable source for Wikipedia. The blog from 2006 is a different matter. The estimates in both are identical as far as I can tell, so I think it would be pertinent that if Rummel has to be cited, we stick with the book, and not the blog which takes readers to a polemical, right-wing site.

Recognizing this challenge, researchers have developed an AI program called SIDE (Source-Inference from Derivability Evaluation) that aims to improve the reliability of Wikipedia references. SIDE achieves this by training algorithms to identify citations on the website that may be questionable. The AI program operates under the assumption that ...

Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Mail. -- Guy Macon ( talk ) 22:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist.If a citation without an external link is challenged as unavailable, any of the following is sufficient to show the material to be reasonably available (though not necessarily reliable): providing an ISBN or OCLC number; linking to an established Wikipedia article about the source (the work, its author, or its publisher); or directly quoting ...It cannot be the case that publication or exposition per se makes a source unreservably reliable - what you are saying is that first hand evidence is less reliable than second hand reporting and, Bill Huffman, if that is your creed, I suggest you hand back your degree along with Wikipedia's credibility.81.152.237.116 16:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Barrie Blake-ColemanI see no reason against it being a WP:Reliable source. That discussion has nothing to do with this page. Catholic encyclopedia is used all over Wikipedia, so I see no reason why it should be questioned just here. Again, this seems to be raising a higher standard here regarding the Catholic encyclopedia than elsewhere in Wikipedia.At ThoughtCo, we believe that great inspiration begins with a question, and we help 13 million users answer theirs every month. Whether yours is about science and math, humanities and religion, or architecture and the arts, our in-depth articles, written by literature writers, Ph.D.s, and experienced instructors, are designed to give you the …The best kind of sources for Wikipedia are reliable, third-party sources (not published by or related to the subject of the article). Wikipedia:Help with sources has more information about these and why they are needed. Unfortunately, the Simple English Wikipedia has many articles which do not have these kinds of sources, or in fact any sources ... About us. The demand for good-quality statistical data continues to increase. Timely and reliable statistics are key inputs to the broad development strategy. Improvements in the quality and quantity of data on all aspects of development are essential if we are to achieve the goal of a world without poverty.The five pillars establish Wikipedia as a free online encyclopedia, with articles that are accurate and cite reliable sources, and editors – called Wikipedians – who avoid bias and treat one another with respect. Policies and guidelines build upon the five pillars by establishing best practices for writing and editing on Wikipedia.Wikipedia: unreliable with caveat — "Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because, as a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong."

1.2 Cocotama's Arabic Wikipedia article. 2 comments. 1.3 Interwiki problem. 6 comments. 1.4 HOW TO UPLOAD A PICTURE IN A PAGE. 3 comments. 1.5 Ip adress. 3 comments. 1.6 2019 European Parliament election in France. 3 comments. 1.7 Editing Reflist. 3 comments. 1.8 Restore Amir Ali Shaik Page. 2 comments. 1.9 Is there going to be an end …Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.Aug 24, 2015 · A 2005 study in the journal Nature found that the information provided on Wikipedia is almost as reliable as that of the benchmark, Encyclopedia Britannica. A 2011 study found that Wiki articles ... Instagram:https://instagram. zillow lenexaquien era simon bolivarspanish rhymeschedule of classe Explain Wikipedia’s history and operations, and how these features can influence the site’s contents. Articulate the appropriate uses of Wikipedia. Participate in Wikipedia as an editor, creator and curator of original content. The Least Reliable Source, Or Is It? Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. Explain Wikipedia’s history and operations, and how these features can influence the site’s contents. Articulate the appropriate uses of Wikipedia. Participate in Wikipedia as an editor, creator and curator of original content. The Least Reliable Source, Or Is It? Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. social marketing is the use of commercial marketing principles toquentin grimes college stats Evaluating Digital Sources. Because so much information is now available online, it’s important to know how to navigate digital sources versus print sources. Today, almost every print source has a digital edition (e.g., ebooks, online newspapers), and some academic journals only publish digitally. However, despite the many credible digital ... 3 interesting facts about langston hughes Reuters using Wikipedia as a source does not make Wikipedia a reliable source generally. WP:V : "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material.", so if someone can cite that YA is a RS, or that the tabloid article for Chabad-Lubavitch article is a RS that would be a start.Per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Religious sources, religious sources may be accepted as a source for their own views, and such personal views should be presented in accordance with WP:RSOPINION. Religious scripture is a primary source and should be avoided per WP:PRIMARY, except for direct quotations. For everything else (history, …